Maintien de la paix. Apports et limites de l’action diplomatique sud-africaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce document étudie les apports et les limites de l’Afrique du Sud en matière de maintien de la paix. L’Afrique du Sud, première puissance économique et militaire africaine et pays émergent, joue un rôle diplomatique important en Afrique, le continent qui accueille le plus grand nombre des actions de maintien de la paix. Ses capacités et son leadership lui ont permis de remorquer des processus de médiation, de mobiliser des intervenants extérieurs, de se mettre en première ligne dans certaines opérations de maintien de la paix, renforçant ainsi sa crédibilité dans la gestion des conflits. Toutefois, depuis quelque temps, l’engagement de l’Afrique du Sud, qui présentait déjà beaucoup de faiblesses, tant en termes de capacités que de leadership conforme à sa réputation et à son statut, semble connaître une perte de vitesse. En revanche, on note une montée en puissance d’uneRealpolitik, qui suscite beaucoup de critiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".