MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095863531 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1556886

A decorrelator based successive interference cancellation multiuser multirate receiver

2006· article· en· W2095863531 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Yang, Florence Danilo-Lemoine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationMultiuser detectionComputer scienceCode division multiple accessMultipath propagationDetectorAsynchronous communicationRakeRayleigh fadingDecorrelationChannel (broadcasting)Interference (communication)AlgorithmFadingRake receiverProcess gainSpread spectrumMatched filterElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new decorrelator based successive interference cancellation (DBSIC) multiuser Rake receiver is proposed for asynchronous variable processing gain (VPG) multirate code division multiple access (CDMA) systems over multipath Rayleigh fading channels. By including a decorrelator on top of matched filtering (MF) at each stage of the conventional successive interference cancellation (SIC) receiver to determine the user's signal for the next stage, DBSIC improves the overall system performance at the expense of feasible additional complexity. The simulation results show performance gains for DBSIC over the decorrelating and SIC detectors in the scenario of perfect channel estimation. While it is observed that the system performance degrades under imperfect channel side information, DBSIC consistently outperforms the decorrelating and SIC detectors. It is also shown that while the conventional cancellation/detecting order based on MF outputs outperforms random detecting order for both SIC and DBSIC under perfect or mild imperfect channel estimation, DBSIC performance is less sensitive to the detection ordering method than SIC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207