MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095878534 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1998.761950

Generalized dissipation in hysteretic systems

2002· article· en· W2095878534 on OpenAlexaff
Rob Gorbet, Kirsten Morris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipative systemDissipationHysteresisWork (physics)Control theory (sociology)Thermal management of electronic devices and systemsComponent (thermodynamics)Computer sciencePosition (finance)PhysicsControl (management)Mechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give a formal definition of dissipative systems that is considerably more general than earlier definitions. The measured output is irrelevant in this formulation. The key component of dissipation is an appropriate work rate. We also define cycle-dissipation and show how it can be used to obtain a suitable work rate. Using this idea, we propose a new work rate for the Preisach hysteresis model, and demonstrate dissipativity with respect to this rate. The Preisach model describes the dynamics of many "smart materials" such as shape memory alloys. This new type of dissipativity will be beneficial in the design of position controllers for SMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207