Pour qui et à qui ce parc ? Gentrification et appropriation de l’espace public dans l’arrondissement du Sud-Ouest de Montréal (Canada)1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude exploratoire dans l’arrondissement du Sud-Ouest à Montréal, relative aux effets de la revitalisation des espaces publics sur les transformations physiques et sociales des quartiers avoisinants. Même si l’insertion de nouveaux logements luxueux dans le tissu existant peut paraître statistiquement marginale, les résidants traditionnels ont été et sont témoins de transformations de leur milieu de vie. Ces transformations ont un impact sur leur territoire quotidien. Les résultats de nos enquêtes basées sur une approche méthodologique mixte indiquent une (re)définition du territoire du chez-soi, excluant le parc du canal de Lachine, parmi les résidants traditionnels du secteur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".