Statistics of the mid‐altitude cusp observed by Polar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Polar GGS space mission has allowed the northern hemispheric polar cusp region to be probed in a variety of ways to further our understanding and knowledge of the processes that occur within this region. The discovery of pulsed, energy‐dispersed ion injections on newly‐opened field lines (Pulsed Particle Signatures, or PPSs), the magnetospheric plasma signatures of transient reconnection, is one such advancement in our knowledge. Utilising a ∼22 months subset of Polar's mission, we perform a statistical study of the dayside traversals of the cusp region by the spacecraft to determine the extent and location of PPSs as well as the prevailing Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) conditions under which they occur. In this paper we report upon the broad extent of these signatures in latitude and local time regardless of IMF orientation, and show that PPSs occur under both southward and northward IMF conditions in high percentages, although favouring southward directed IMF. These results are discussed in terms of previous statistical studies of reconnection signatures, and in terms of lobe and low latitude reconnection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".