Le Québec sous le règne d’Anastasie : l’expérience censoriale durant la Première Guerre mondiale1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien qu’elle ait été élevée au rang de stratégie militaire par les chefs d’État lors de la Première Guerre mondiale et qu’elle ait été l’une des premières mesures instaurées par les autorités canadiennes lors du déclenchement des hostilités, la censure de la presse demeure pourtant peu étudiée. De 1914 à 1918, les journalistes canadiens sont aux prises avec les exigences, les récriminations et les sanctions du censeur. L’article qui suit examine spécifiquement les réactions des journalistes canadiens-français face à l’application d’une mesure visant à réduire leur droit de s’exprimer librement. La censure s’intensifiant au fur et à mesure que l’effort de guerre canadien est remis en question, les journalistes d’expression française réagissent de manière parfois contradictoire et oscillent entre la collaboration volontaire et la résistance active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".