Anesthetic Considerations for Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients with Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of adults with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood is increasing. The proportion of adults undergoing revision of a previous repair is increasing in comparison to those that present for a palliative or curative operation. At the Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, 528 patients underwent cardiac surgery between January 1, 1992 and December 31, 2001. The anesthetic management of the surgical correction of simple and complex congenital heart lesions includes general physiologic considerations such as dysrhythmias, hypoxemia, polycythemia, and pulmonary hypertension. Palliative shunts from early childhood have anatomical and physiologic implications for the adult. Preparation for the operating room and postoperative care are natural extensions of the anesthetic management of the surgical correction of the congenital heart lesions. Anesthetic management of septal lesions in the interventional suite and operating room is discussed. Complex lesions such as tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, Glenn anastomosis, and the Fontan operation are reviewed. The anesthetic management of these patients is rewarding but impossible without an integrated team approach involving cardiologists, surgeons, perfusionists, and nursing staff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".