MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096022278 · doi:10.1177/108925320300700203

Anesthetic Considerations for Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

2003· article· en· W2096022278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jane Heggie, Nancy Poirer, William G. Williams, Jacek Karski

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetralogy of FallotHeart diseaseGreat arteriesCardiac surgerySurgeryAnestheticTetralogyHypoxemiaCardiopulmonary bypassAnesthesiaCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of adults with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood is increasing. The proportion of adults undergoing revision of a previous repair is increasing in comparison to those that present for a palliative or curative operation. At the Toronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, 528 patients underwent cardiac surgery between January 1, 1992 and December 31, 2001. The anesthetic management of the surgical correction of simple and complex congenital heart lesions includes general physiologic considerations such as dysrhythmias, hypoxemia, polycythemia, and pulmonary hypertension. Palliative shunts from early childhood have anatomical and physiologic implications for the adult. Preparation for the operating room and postoperative care are natural extensions of the anesthetic management of the surgical correction of the congenital heart lesions. Anesthetic management of septal lesions in the interventional suite and operating room is discussed. Complex lesions such as tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, Glenn anastomosis, and the Fontan operation are reviewed. The anesthetic management of these patients is rewarding but impossible without an integrated team approach involving cardiologists, surgeons, perfusionists, and nursing staff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207