Robust QoS-guaranteed network engineering in interference-aware wireless networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the time-varying nature of wireless networks, it is required to find robust optimal methods to control the behavior and performance of such networks; however, this is a challenging task since robustness metrics and QoS-based (Quality of service) constraints in a wireless environment are typically highly non-linear and non-convex. This paper explores the possibility of using graph theoretic metrics to provide robustness in a wireless network at the presence of a set of QoS constraints. In particular, we are interested in robust planning of a wireless network for a given demand matrix while preserving end-to-end delay for input demands below a given threshold set. To this end, we show that the upper bound of end-to-end round trip time between two nodes of a network can be approximated by point-to-point network criticality (or resistance distance) of the network. We construct a convex optimization problem to provide a delay-guaranteed jointly optimal allocation of transmit powers and link flows. We show that the solution provides a robust behavior, i.e. it is insensitive to the environmental changes such as wireless link disruption, this is expected because network criticality is a robustness metric. Our framework can be applied to a wide range of SINR (Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio) values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".