MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096032061 · doi:10.1017/s0008423905269986

Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices

2005· article· en· W2096032061 on OpenAlexaff
Genevieve Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingSkepticismPoliticsNarrativePublic administrationPublic policyPolitical sciencePositivismPublic discourseSociologyMedia studiesEpistemologyLawSocial psychologyPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices , Frank Fischer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. xii, 266. Although in some ways perpetuating a counter-factual narrative about positivist policy analysis and research, Frank Fischer's Reframing Public Policy is an important book because it provides critical perspectives on the dominant forms of inquiry while also articulating in detail complementary or alternative methodologies. This book is not likely to disappoint followers—nor is it likely to persuade sceptics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Political ScienceSame topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207