MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096050077 · doi:10.1061/9780784412619.083

Large-Scale Laboratory Experiments to Advance the Design and Performance of Buried Pipe Infrastructure

2012· article· en· W2096050077 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian D. Moore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrenchless technologyTruckCulvertOverburdenAxleSpan (engineering)EngineeringWork (physics)Structural engineeringAxle loadCivil engineeringMarine engineeringComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineeringPipeline transportAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research studies examining buried pipes cannot rely on computational work alone, and physical experiments are needed for credible evaluation of buried pipe performance at service and ultimate loads. Specialized testing facilities are described which can be used to undertake buried pipe experiments on structures up to 10 m span at shallow cover, and pipes of 0.6 m diameter or less up to 1000 kPa overburden pressure (about 50 m burial). The capabilities include service load testing under real vehicles, and testing to ultimate limit states under simulated axle loads of up to 2000 kN (about 9 times the normal service load for a tandem axle design truck). Use of the facility is briefly illustrated through reference to six different projects on pipes and culverts installed using conventional and trenchless construction techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207