Functional properties of the carboxy-terminal host cell-binding domains of the two toxins, TcdA and TcdB, expressed by Clostridium difficile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biological and ligand-binding properties of recombinant C-terminal cell-binding domains (CBDs) and subdomains of the two large exotoxins, Toxin A (TcdA) and Toxin B (TcdB) expressed by Clostridium difficile were examined in the hemagglutination and Verocytotoxicity neutralization assays and by qualitative affinity chromatography using Sepharose-linked alpha Gal(1,3)betaGal(1,4)beta Glc as well as the direct electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ES-MS) assay. These studies revealed that, whereas the full-length TcdA CBD agglutinated rabbit erythrocytes, neutralized TcdA-mediated Vero cell death and bound to alpha Gal(1,3)betaGal(1,4)beta Glc-derivatized Sepharose, the TcdB CBD was inactive in these functional assays. Moreover, retention by alpha Gal(1,3)betaGal(1,4)beta Glc-derivatized Sepharose corresponded to the number of available TcdA subdomain ligand-binding sites. By contrast, the ES-MS assays revealed that both the TcdA and TcdB CBD bind to 8-methoxycarbonyloctyl-alpha Gal(1,3)betaGal(1,4)beta Glc sequences with similar avidities. Additional ES-MS experiments using chemically altered alpha Gal(1,3)betaGal(1,4)beta Glc sequences also revealed that the TcdA and TcdB CBD will tolerate a fair amount of structural variation in their complementary glycan ligands. Although the studies are consistent with the known ligand-binding properties of the TcdA and TcdB holotoxins, they also revealed subtle heretofore unrecognized functional differences in their receptor recognition properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".