MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096100309 · doi:10.1353/arc.2012.0013

An Archaeological Test of the Effects of the White River Ash Eruptions

2012· article· en· W2096100309 on OpenAlex
Patrick Mullen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Anthropology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiocarbon datingArchaeologyVolcanoGeologyTaphonomyVolcanic ashProxy (statistics)PopulationPhysical geographyWhite (mutation)GeographyGeochemistryDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hypothesis that Athapaskan speakers in Alaska, British Columbia, and the Yukon Territory were displaced by volcanic eruptions at 1147 and 1830 cal B.P. is tested using radiocarbon dates as a proxy for population. Published data concerning the extent of the ash lobes were digitized in GIS to select dates recovered from anthropogenic contexts from within the affected areas and from regions thought to have absorbed the immigrant populations. Changes in the frequency of calibrated, taphonomic-bias-corrected radiocarbon dates from the areas of the White River Ash (WRA) eruptions suggest that both eruptions precipitated migration events. Results are tentative due to limited sample sizes, but demonstrate the potential to use radiocarbon dates to track regional abandonment and migrations caused by catastrophic events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it