MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096153650 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0620

Amorphous solar cell on multilayer of SnO<sub>2</sub>/ZnO TCO substrate for full spectrum splitting solar cell application

2014· article· en· W2096153650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sinae Kim, Dong‐Won Kang, Porponth Sichanugrist, Makoto Konagai

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Economy, Trade and Industry
KeywordsSolar cellOptoelectronicsAmorphous solidAmorphous siliconWavelengthSubstrate (aquarium)SiliconBand gapSolar cell efficiencyTransparent conducting filmPhysicsMaterials scienceOpticsThin filmCrystalline siliconNanotechnologyCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To increase the performance of thin film solar cells, the solar spectrum splitting technique has been considered and studied. It was found from the simulation that the total efficiency of nearly 25% can be obtained at the splitting wavelength of 614 nm with the top cell using higher band gap material. The experiment has been carried out to verify the simulation results. Up to now a total efficiency of about 22.0% has been obtained using hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) and Cu(In 1– x ,Ga x ) as the top and bottom cells, respectively, at a splitting wavelength of 620 nm. In this study, we have developed a multilayer of transparent and conductive oxide (TCO) substrate of a-Si:H solar cell with better electrical properties especially improved fill factor and better electrical compatibility. This multilayer TCO is suitable for the splitting technique to enhance the performance at the short-wavelength of the top cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207