The site of RanGTP generation can act as an organizational cue for mitotic microtubules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RanGTP, which is generated on chromosomes during mitosis, is required for microtubule spindle assembly. Due to its restricted spatial generation within the cell it has been suggested that RanGTP acts as a spatial cue to organize site-specific spindle assembly within the cell. However, the absence of a detectable sharp gradient of RanGTP in somatic cells has led to suggestions that it may only act as a spatial cue in large cells and that it may operate as a general activator of the mitotic cytosol in somatic cells. RESULTS: We report that ectopic generation of RanGTP at the plasma membrane stimulates the formation of organized arrays of microtubules at the plasma membrane. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the site of RanGTP generation in a mitotic somatic cell can generate critical spatial information that specifies where microtubules grow towards and where microtubules are organized. As RanGTP is normally generated on chromosomes, these results suggest that RanGTP may play an important role in specifying that spindle assembly occurs around chromosomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".