MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096171306 · doi:10.1042/bc20100135

The site of RanGTP generation can act as an organizational cue for mitotic microtubules

2011· article· en· W2096171306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Cell · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRanBiologyCell biologyMitosisMicrotubuleSpindle apparatusSomatic cellCell divisionCellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RanGTP, which is generated on chromosomes during mitosis, is required for microtubule spindle assembly. Due to its restricted spatial generation within the cell it has been suggested that RanGTP acts as a spatial cue to organize site-specific spindle assembly within the cell. However, the absence of a detectable sharp gradient of RanGTP in somatic cells has led to suggestions that it may only act as a spatial cue in large cells and that it may operate as a general activator of the mitotic cytosol in somatic cells. RESULTS: We report that ectopic generation of RanGTP at the plasma membrane stimulates the formation of organized arrays of microtubules at the plasma membrane. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the site of RanGTP generation in a mitotic somatic cell can generate critical spatial information that specifies where microtubules grow towards and where microtubules are organized. As RanGTP is normally generated on chromosomes, these results suggest that RanGTP may play an important role in specifying that spindle assembly occurs around chromosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it