Management of patients with advanced bladder cancer following major response to systemic chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemotherapy continues to be the treatment of choice for advanced/metastatic bladder cancer. Although response rates as high as 70% have been achieved, there continue to be high progression rates and poor long-term survival. Surgical consolidation offers improved outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone, especially in patients who achieve complete clinical response to chemotherapy. The role of radiation and/or surveillance following major response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced disease remains unclear. Gross regional nodal involvement identified at the time of surgery does not preclude radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection may be beneficial to select patients with nonregional retroperitoneal nodal metastasis who achieve good clinical response to chemotherapy. Visceral or lung metastasectomy may be offered to patients with solitary metastasis who achieve a good and durable response to chemotherapy. Nonresponders should be either offered a clinical trial (if available), second-line chemotherapy or best supportive care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".