MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096200347 · doi:10.1139/t06-108

Relationship between soil structure and mechanical behavior for an expansive unsaturated clay

2007· article· en· W2096200347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linchang Miao, Sandra L. Houston, Ying Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansive clayMacroporeGeotechnical engineeringCohesion (chemistry)Soil waterSaturation (graph theory)Soil structureGeologySoil testDegree of saturationIntrusionDirect shear testSoil scienceShear (geology)ChemistryMathematicsGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the soil structure and mechanical behavior of an unsaturated expansive clay soil, triaxial and mercury intrusion tests have been performed and are presented in this paper. Also an optical test system was developed for studying the internal structure evolution of the unsaturated expansive soil during shear-loading tests. The research results show a linear relationship between the cohesion intercept and the degree of saturation of the unsaturated clay for the test data. For the tested soil, the pore-size distribution curves were found to be bimodal. The measurement results from mercury intrusion tests confirm that the micropores of Guangxi expansive soils of this study remain constant, and that the macropores vary with the dry density of soil samples. Comparing the volumetric strain curves with the soil particle area curves, some correlation and dependence on the macropore variation of soil samples during shear-loading tests can be shown to exist.Key words: soil structure, mechanical behavior, unsaturated soil, mercury intrusion, expansive clay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207