Binding of Bone Sialoprotein, Osteopontin and Synthetic Polypeptides to Hydroxyapatite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phosphorylated acidic glycoproteins bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteopontin (OPN) bind to hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals and may be involved in the regulation of bone mineralization. The HA-binding properties of these proteins have been attributed to glutamic acid-rich sequences in BSP and aspartic acid-rich sequences in OPN. The present study examines the roles of these polycarboxylate sequences in the binding of BSP and OPN to HA. Porcine BSP, OPN and the synthetic polypeptides poly-L-glutamic acid [Poly(Glu)] and poly-L-aspartic acid [Poly(Asp)] were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate and their binding to HA determined by fluorimetry. From the binding isotherms, dissociation constants (KDs) for all the reagents tested were determined to be in the micromolar range. The saturation binding capacities of HA for Poly(Glu), Poly(Asp), BSP and OPN were similar (500-600 micrograms/m2). To investigate the role of glutamic acid-rich and aspartic acid-rich sequences in the binding to HA of BSP and OPN, respectively, competitive binding studies with Poly(Glu) and Poly(Asp) were performed. Poly(Glu) was able to displace a maximum of 100% of Poly(Glu), 81% of OPN, 68% of BSP and 65% of Poly(Asp). Poly(Asp) was able to displace a maximum of 100% of Poly(Glu), 99% of Poly(Asp), 95% of OPN and 89% of BSP. These results are consistent with the view that BSP and OPN bind to HA via their polycarboxylate sequences, but suggest a complex mode of interaction between polyelectrolytes and ionic crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".