Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines representations of Chinese laborers in the vitriolic anti-Chinese literature produced and consumed nationally in late-nineteenth-century America. Anti-Chinese literature's depictions of the Chinese as excessively frugal and unnaturally abstentious argued that Chinese immigrants contributed nothing to the American economy; indeed, they hurt it. Such depictions facilitated and reflected changing understandings of the relationship between the act of work and manhood, as the proprietary artisan disappeared and wage work became the norm for most working men. Though wage work threatened to sever connections between working men and masculinity both for society at large and for workers themselves, wage workers increasingly reasserted their status as family breadwinner by providing a disposable income for family consumption. In representing true labor negatively through depictions of the Chinese, Americans began to disassociate long-standing correlations between manliness and production. Instead, they suggested that white, working-class manhood might now be located in consumption instead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it