MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2096240864 · doi:10.7202/032796ar

Substrat glaciotectonisé et till syngénétique à Pont-Rouge, Québec

2007· article· fr· W2096240864 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jacques Schroeder, Michel Beaupré, Marc Cloutier

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grâce à un effondrement à l'aplomb d'une galerie souterraine qui recoupe un méandre de la rivière Jacques-Cartier à Pont-Rouge, des calcaires fortement glaciotectonisés ont pu être observés. Toutes les perturbations d'origine glaciaire de l'encaissant y sont relevées pour la première fois en un même site. Elles sont remarquablement conservées par un till de fond épais de près de 10 m. Sur à peine 40 m de distance on observe : un plan de diaclase en contact avec un till, des plans de stratification décollés et rebroussés par du till, un pli-faille partiellement coffré dont le coeur et le plan de chevauchement contiennent du till, un plan de chevauchement servant de « faille de rampe » pour des copeaux submétriques de calcaire, des fissures ouvertes injectées de till et ayant subi une rotation vers la droite de 25°. Enfin à l'interface entre le calcaire glaciotectonisé et celui en place, on trouve des stries glaciaires avec polarité ouest-est. Nous pensons que c'est au plus tard au maximum glaciaire du Wisconsinien supérieur que se situerait leur apparition. Advenant la confirmation de cette hypothèse, il faudrait alors en conclure que la calotte glaciaire laurentidienne, à cette époque et localement, s'écoulait vers l'est.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et Quaternaire→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→