Evaluation of a Structural Model of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Outer Membrane Protein OprM, an Efflux Component Involved in Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The outer membrane protein OprM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is involved in intrinsic and mutational multiple-antibiotic resistance as part of two resistance-nodulation-division efflux systems. The crystal structure of TolC, a homologous protein in Escherichia coli, was recently published (V. Koronakis, A. Sharff, E. Koronakis, B. Luisl, and C. Hughes, Nature 405:914-919, 2000), demonstrating a distinctive architecture comprising outer membrane beta-barrel and periplasmic helical-barrel structures, which assemble differently from the common beta-barrel-only conformation of porins. Based on their sequence similarity, a similar content of alpha-helical and beta-sheet structure determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy, and our observation that OprM, like TolC, reconstitutes channels in planar bilayer membranes, OprM and TolC were considered to be structurally homologous, and a model of OprM was constructed by threading its sequence to the TolC crystal structure. Residues thought to be important for the TolC structure were conserved in space in this OprM model. Analyses of deletion mutants and previously isolated insertion mutants of OprM in the context of this model allowed us to propose roles for different protein domains. Our data indicate that the helical barrel of the protein is critical for both the function and the integrity of the protein, while a C-terminal domain localized around the equatorial plane of this helical barrel is dispensable. Extracellular loops appear to play a lesser role in substrate specificity for this efflux protein compared to classical porins, and there appears to be a correlation between the change in antimicrobial activity for OprM mutants and the pore size. Our model and channel formation studies support the "iris" mechanism of action for TolC and permit us now to form more focused hypotheses about the functional domains of OprM and its related family of efflux proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".