Parasitism of the eggs of Lygus shulli and Lygus elisus (Heteroptera: Miridae) by Anaphesiole (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Females of the egg parasitoid Anaphes iole Girault (Hymenoptera: Myrmaridae) accepted and oviposited in eggs of both Lygus shulli Knight and L. elisus Van Duzee (Heteroptera: Miridae) when presented on sections of green bean pod in the laboratory.Resulting A. iole larvae developed normally on eggs of both host species and emerged as adults.The wings of 4. iole emerging from L. shulli eggs were significantly larger than those from L. elisus probably because the eggs of L. shulli were larger.Anaphes iole females parasitized only approximately 50% of the eggs available of either host species.This may indicate that 50% of the hosts were suitable and rejected, that 50% were unsuitable for oviposition, or that the structure of bean pods prevents females from finding or ovipositing in 50% of hosts.Anaphes iole has potential for biological control of Lygus spp. on greenhouse vegetables in southwestern British Columbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".