MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096285240 · doi:10.1109/twc.2010.02.081719

Moment-based SNR estimation over linearly-modulated wireless SIMO channels

2010· article· en· W2096285240 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Stéphenne, Faouzi Bellili, Sofiène Affes

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorA priori and a posterioriAdditive white Gaussian noiseMoment (physics)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)AlgorithmComputer scienceEstimation theoryMean squared errorMathematicsStatisticsWhite noisePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a new method for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation when multiple antenna elements receive linearly-modulated signals in complex additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) spatially uncorrelated between the antenna elements. We also derive extensions of other existing moment-based SNR estimators to the single-input multiple-output (SIMO) configuration. The new SIMO SNR estimation technique is non-data-aided (NDA) since it is a moment-based method and does not rely, therefore, on the a priori knowledge or detection of the transmitted symbols; it does not require the a priori knowledge of the modulation type or order. The new method is shown by Monte Carlo simulations to clearly outperform the best NDA moment-based SNR estimation methods in terms of normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) over QAM-modulated transmissions, namely the M2M4method and the estimators referred to, in this paper, as the GT and the M6methods, even when we extend them to the SIMO configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207