MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096330019 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378005

Spectrally-efficient differential-space-time coding using non-full-diverse constellations

2005· article· en· W2096330019 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Taherzadeh, Amir K. Khandani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectral efficiencyDecoding methodsComputer scienceAlgorithmConstellationCoding (social sciences)Transmit diversitySpace–time codeAntenna (radio)Differential (mechanical device)Unitary stateFull RateCode (set theory)Construct (python library)Coding gainBlock codeTheoretical computer scienceTelecommunicationsMathematicsFadingEngineeringComputer networkPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method to construct spectrally-efficient unitary space-time codes is proposed for high-rate differential communications over multiple-antenna channels. Unlike most of the known methods which are designed to maximize the diversity product (minimum determinant distance), we aim at increasing the spectral efficiency. Simulation results indicate that for high spectral efficiency and for more than one receive antenna, the new method significantly outperforms the known alternatives. In the special case of two transmit antennas, which is the main focus of the paper, the relation between the proposed code and the Alamouti scheme helps us to provide an efficient maximum likelihood decoding algorithm. We also show that similar ideas can be applied to more than two transmit antennas. As an example, we present a construction for 4 by 4 unitary constellations which has good performance as compared to the other known codes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207