MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096330788 · doi:10.2190/il.22.4.b

“Strong Men Don't Cry, but I'm Not Strong Anymore”: A Case Study of Bodily Engagement with Stories of Loss and Grief in Palliative Care

2014· article· en· W2096330788 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Mundle

Bibliographic record

VenueIllness Crisis & Loss · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessGriefActive listeningPalliative careEmbodied cognitionPsychologyExistentialismReflexivityPsychotherapistPsychoanalysisMedicineNursingSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case study addresses the importance of “life review” with regard to the crucial and demanding emotional work of older adults in palliative care who are experiencing the existential pain of grief and loneliness near the end of life. Drawing upon the reflexive field notes of one Spiritual Health Practitioner this case study describes the spiritual needs and care for an older deafened and emotionally-inhibited man in a long-term palliative care unit who described himself by saying “all I am is stories.” By illuminating the concept of “embodied listening” in response to stories told by a patient with significant hearing loss this case study differentiates the uses of voice and of body in therapeutic relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIllness Crisis & LossSame topicCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207