MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096333267 · doi:10.4141/cjas07145

Effects of dim light at night on milk yield, milk composition and endocrine profile of lactating dairy cows

2008· article· en· W2096333267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehmet Ali Bal, Greg B Penner, M. Oba, Alma D Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicImpact of Light on Environment and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactationMelatoninDairy cattleAnimal scienceMilk productionLight intensityBiologyComposition (language)Endocrine systemHormoneEndocrinologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of night-time light intensity on lactation performance and hormonal profiles in lactating dairy cattle. Twenty-four multiparous lactating dairy cows were exposed to light intensities of 0 to 5 lx (CONTROL) and 40 to 60 lx (DIM-LIGHT) from 1800 to 0400 in a cross-over design with 28-d periods. Contrary to the pre-trial hypothesis, melatonin release was not suppressed by DIM-LIGHT at night, and treatment effects on milk and milk component yields were not detected. Key words: Dim light, melatonin, milk production

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicImpact of Light on Environment and HealthFrench-language works237,207