MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096341834 · doi:10.1109/icip.1995.537705

A pyramid algorithm for fast fractal image compression

2002· article· en· W2096341834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)FractalAlgorithmFractal transformFractal compressionImage (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematicsData compressionSequence (biology)Code (set theory)Encoding (memory)Image compressionImage processingArtificial intelligenceGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a fast fractal image encoding algorithm which is based on a refinement of the fractal code from an initial coarse level of the pyramid. The pyramid search algorithm is quasi-optimal in terms of minimizing the mean square error. Assuming that the distribution of the matching error is described by an independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) Laplacian random process, we derive the threshold sequence for the objective function in each pyramidal level. The computational efficiency depends on the depth of the pyramid and the search step size and could be improved up to two orders of magnitude compared with the full search of the original image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it