MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096366431 · doi:10.1109/redw.1995.483408

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SEE TESTING AND RESEARCH AT THE CHALK RIVER TASCC HEAVY ION FACILITY

2005· article· en· W2096366431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclotronTandem acceleratorNuclear physicsHeavy ionRange (aeronautics)PhysicsNuclear engineeringCosmic rayUraniumIonIrradiationTandemEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chalk River Laboratories' Tandem Accelerator Superconducting Cyclotron (TASCC) facility comprises a 15 MV MP Tandem which can be used alone or in conjunction with a superconducting cyclotron postaccelerator. TASCC provides ions from protons to uranium and energies from a few MeV to almost 3000 MeV. The facility can thus cover the complete range of LET's required for SEE testing, with the added bonus of longer ranges to better simulate the effects of cosmic radiation. A simple irradiation chamber has been used for the study of individual devices for some time; a state-of-the-art SEE facility is being developed for testing circuit boards in vacuum or in air, This paper will describe the properties of TASCC, and the existing and planned irradiation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207