MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096451963 · doi:10.1142/s0218195908002751

MEDIAL AXIS APPROXIMATION AND UNSTABLE FLOW COMPLEX

2008· article· en· W2096451963 on OpenAlexaff
Joachim Giesen, Edgar A. Ramos, Bardia Sadri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedial axisMathematicsBoundary (topology)Topology (electrical circuits)HomotopyBounded functionFlow (mathematics)Simply connected spaceClosenessGeometryMathematical analysisCombinatoricsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The medial axis of a shape is known to carry a lot of information about the shape. In particular, a recent result of Lieutier establishes that every bounded open subset of ℝn has the same homotopy type as its medial axis. In this paper we provide an algorithm that computes a structure we call the core for the approximation of the medial axis of a shape with smooth boundary from a discrete sample of its boundary. The core is a piecewise linear cell complex that is guaranteed to capture the topology of the medial axis of the shape provided the sample of its boundary is sufficiently dense but not necessarily uniform. We also present a natural method for augmenting the core in order to extend it geometrically while maintaining the topological guarantees. The definition of the core and its extension are based on the steepest ascent flow map that results from the distance function induced by the sample point set. We also provide a geometric guarantee on the closeness of the core and the actual medial axis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & ApplicationsSame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207