Failure Mode Transition in Air-Backed Plates from Near Contact Underwater Explosions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent experiments involving near-contact underwater explosions on air-backed plates suggest the following failure mode categories: (1) holing and petaling, (2) complete or partial edge tearing due to shock only, (3) complete or partial edge tearing due to shock and bubble collapse, and (4) large deformation without rupture. Finite-element analysis was used to further investigate the detailed response and failure of the plates, and determine the limit between center plate holing and edge failure. When compared with experimental results, finite-elements showed good agreement with the failure modes of the plates and reasonable agreement with the experimental deformations. It was found that the linear interaction criteria (LIC) failure between plastic strain and through-thickness shear stress produced results closer to experiments than the quadratic interaction criteria (QIC). For the 18~gauge specimens it was found that the through-thickness shear dominated the failure initiation for very close proximity charges, with the direct strain becoming dominant as the standoff was increased. For the thinner 20 and 22 gauge plates the direct strain was always found to be the dominant factor in the failure criteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".