THE IMPORTANCE OF INHIBITORS FOR THE SIMULATION OF METABOLIC PROCESSES: <i>IN SILICO</i><font>Zn<sup>2+</sup></font> INHIBITION OF m-ACONITASE FROM ANALYSIS OF GLYCOLYSIS AND KREBS CYCLE KINETIC MODELS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal ions have a major effect on the metabolic processes in cells either as inhibitors or as integral components of enzymes. The inhibition of enzymes can take place either through the inhibition of gene expression or through inhibition of protein function. A particularly interesting example of the effect of a metal ion on metabolism is the observed inhibition of Krebs cycle and alteration of energy metabolism by zinc (II) cations. In this particular case metal ion inhibition of enzyme is linked to one of the major functions of prostate cells of accumulation and excretion of citrate. Experimental results have shown that increase in concentration of zinc (II) in prostate cells effectively blocks progression of a part of the Krebs cycle leading to change in the concentration of several metabolites with largest effect in the accumulation of citrate. Based on previously reported experimental results, several distinct mechanisms for zinc (II) inhibition of Krebs cycle were proposed. In order to determine the precise mechanism of inhibition in this system, a mathematical model of glycolysis and Krebs cycle was constructed. Three different types of inhibition were analyzed, including competitive and uncompetitive inhibition as well as inhibition through the alteration of the expression level of m-aconitase. The effects of different inhibition models on metabolite concentrations were investigated as a time course simulation of the system of reactions. Several kinetic parameters in the model were optimized in order to best resemble experimental measurements. The simulation shows that only competitive inhibition leads to an agreement with experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".