Cerebral Vasodilatation to Exogenous NO Is a Measure of Fitness for Life at Altitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Andean highlanders, unlike Ethiopians, develop chronic mountain sickness (CMS), a maladaptation to their native land. Ambient hypoxia induces NO-mediated vasodilatation. Fitness for life at altitude might be revealed by cerebrovascular responses to NO. METHODS: Nine altitude-native men were examined at 3622 and 794 m in Ethiopia and compared with 9 altitude-native Andean men tested at 4338 and 150 m in Peru. We assessed CMS scores, hematocrits, end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide (P(ET)co2), oxygen saturations, and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBV). We evaluated fitness for life at altitude from the cerebrovascular response to an exogenous NO donor. RESULTS: At high altitude, CMS scores and hematocrits were higher in Andeans, and they had lower oxygen saturations. Ethiopians had higher P(ET)co2 at all study sites. At low altitude, saturations were similar in both groups. Responsiveness of the cerebral circulation to NO was minimal in Ethiopians at low altitude, whereas Andeans had a large response. In contrast, at high altitude, Ethiopians showed large responses, and Peruvians had minimal responses. CONCLUSIONS: By our measure, high altitude-native Peruvians were well-adapted lowlanders, whereas Ethiopian highlanders were well adapted to altitude life. Environmental pressures were sufficient for human adaptation to chronic hypoxia in Africa but not South America. The mechanisms underlying these differences are unknown, although studies of neurovascular diseases suggest that this may be related to a NO receptor polymorphism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".