MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096549168 · doi:10.1038/nature10640

The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations

2011· article· en· W2096549168 on OpenAlexafffund
Miodrag Grbić, Thomas Van Leeuwen, Richard M. Clark, Stéphane Rombauts, Pierre Rouzé, Vojislava Grbić, Edward J. Osborne, Wannes Dermauw, Phuong Cao Thi Ngoc, Félix Ortego, Pedro Hernández‐Crespo, Isabel Dı́az, Manuel Martínez, M. Navajas, Élio Sucena, Sara Magalhães, Lisa M. Nagy, Ryan M. Pace, Sergej Djuranović, Guy Smagghe, Masatoshi Iga, Olivier Christiaens, Jan A. Veenstra, John Ewer, Rodrigo A. Mancilla, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Stephen D. Hudson, Marisela Vélez, Soojin V. Yi, Jia Zeng, André Pires‐daSilva, Fernando Roch, Marc Cazaux, Marie Navarro, Vladimir Zhurov, Gustavo Acevedo-Hernández, Anica Bjelica, Jeffrey A. Fawcett, Éric Bonnet, Cindy Martens, Guy Baele, Lothar Wissler, Aminael Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Luc Tirry, Catherine Blais, Kristof Demeestere, Stefan R. Henz, T. Ryan Gregory, Johannes Mathieu, Lou Verdon, Laurent Farinelli, Jeremy Schmutz, Erika Lindquist, René Feyereisen, Yves Van de Peer

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of GuelphWestern University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceVlaamse regeringUniversiteit GentOntario Genomics InstituteFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekGovernment of CanadaBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeGenome CanadaJoint Genome InstituteOntario GenomicsU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTetranychus urticaeBiologySpider miteGenomePEST analysisMiteGeneGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spider mite Tetranychus urticae is a cosmopolitan agricultural pest with an extensive host plant range and an extreme record of pesticide resistance. Here we present the completely sequenced and annotated spider mite genome, representing the first complete chelicerate genome. At 90 megabases T. urticae has the smallest sequenced arthropod genome. Compared with other arthropods, the spider mite genome shows unique changes in the hormonal environment and organization of the Hox complex, and also reveals evolutionary innovation of silk production. We find strong signatures of polyphagy and detoxification in gene families associated with feeding on different hosts and in new gene families acquired by lateral gene transfer. Deep transcriptome analysis of mites feeding on different plants shows how this pest responds to a changing host environment. The T. urticae genome thus offers new insights into arthropod evolution and plant–herbivore interactions, and provides unique opportunities for developing novel plant protection strategies. The genome of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae is sequenced, providing insights into its polyphagous feeding, silk production, hormonal repertoire and reduced Hox cluster. The spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) is a common agricultural pest that feeds on a wide range of hosts — including maize (corn), soya, tomatoes and peppers — and is notoriously resistant to pesticides. Its genome has now been sequenced and analysed, providing insights into its hormonal repertoire and the evolution of silk production. Transcriptome analysis of mites feeding on different plants reveals how this pest defends itself in a changing host environment and gives pointers to possible non-pesticide plant-protection strategies. The genome encodes 17 fibroin genes, and physical tests of spider-mite silk show it to be a natural nanomaterial with fibres that are more than 100 times thinner than those produced by silk spiders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,154
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207