MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096559184 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4650239

Complimentary artificial neural network approaches for prediction of events in the neonatal intensive care unit

2008· article· en· W2096559184 on OpenAlexaff
Daphne Townsend, Monique Frize

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkFlexibility (engineering)Gradient descentComputer scienceNeonatal intensive care unitArtificial intelligenceSensitivity (control systems)EstimationMechanical ventilationMachine learningStatisticsMathematicsEngineeringMedicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the neonatal intensive care unit, the early and accurate prediction of mortality, length of stay and duration of ventilation can improve decision making. For physiological events, non-linear prediction models generally out-perform statistical-based approaches, as was confirmed in these experiments. For three medical outcomes, the maximum-likelihood (ML) approximation was used in conjunction with a gradient descent artificial neural network (ANN) prototype to create models with risk estimation ranges. The ML ANN showed that the ML estimation function was successful at creating variable sensitivity models for three important outcomes. The flexibility of the ML ANN in terms of output values differentiates it from the more traditional ANN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207