MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096586370 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.023

Dendritic cells do not transduce inflammatory stimuli via the capsaicin receptor TRPV1

2005· article· en· W2096586370 on OpenAlexaff
Peta J. O’Connell, Sandeep C. Pingle, Gerard P. Ahern

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsTRPV1CapsaicinExtracellularChemistryCell biologyIntracellularSensory systemReceptorNeuroscienceTransient receptor potential channelSignal transductionBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory stimuli provide critical activation signals for dendritic cells (DC). Signaling through the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 is reported to initiate DC maturation and migration. We attempted to characterize TRPV1 channels in DC. Capsaicin or extracellular protons failed to elicit a change in intracellular [Ca(2+)] or membrane current in DC. In contrast, capsaicin evoked a sustained increase in [Ca(2+)] and large inwards currents in sensory neurons and TRPV1-expressing HEK293 cells. TRPV1 expression was confirmed by RT-PCR in sensory neurons, but was undetectable in DC. Interestingly, and in contrast to capsaicin, the inflammatory neuropeptide substance P evoked Ca(2+) transients in DC. Thus, our data do not support the hypothesis that DC express TRPV1 channels. Rather, signaling through TRPV1 in sensory nerves may modulate DC via neurogenic actions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207