(Invited) Growing Si Nanocrystals within a-Si Nanoclusters Embedded in a-SiO<sub>2</sub>: Evolution of Photoluminescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We combine X-ray absorption, electron spin resonance and Raman spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction and photoluminescence (PL) techniques to determine the structure and luminescence mechanisms in Si nanoclusters (Si-ncls) embedded within Si oxides at various intermediate formation stages. The Si-ncls/oxide systems are fabricated by thermally annealing plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposited Si-rich Si-oxide films. The structural and chemical orders in the amorphous oxide matrix, the Si-ncls amorphous and crystalline volume fractions and sizes, the dangling bond density and PL spectra and decay rates are followed closely as a function of the annealing temperature. The results can be interpreted by a crystalline core/amorphous shell model for the Si-ncls. The important role of the shell, often ignored in the literature, is discussed. As the Si-ncls crystalline cores grow at the expense of thinning amorphous shells, the PL undergoes a transition from a regime dominated by disorder-induced effects to a situation where quantum confinement prevails.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".