MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096602351 · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000162

Efficient extraction of nucleolar proteins for interactome analyses

2010· article· en· W2096602351 on OpenAlexaff
Delphine Chamousset, Sarah Mamane, François‐Michel Boisvert, Laura Trinkle‐Mulcahy

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractomeNucleolusTandem affinity purificationBiologyComputational biologyProtein purificationProteomicsExtraction (chemistry)OrganelleBiochemistryCell biologyChemistryAffinity chromatographyChromatographyEnzymeCytoplasm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficient extraction of proteins from purified cellular organelles is critical for in vitro analyses, including identification of protein complex members by affinity purification-based quantitative proteomic approaches. When applied to purified nucleoli, classic nuclear protein extraction methods inefficiently and selectively release only approximately 50% of proteins. Here, we present a method that can extract up to 90% of nucleolar proteins, and apply it in a quantitative interactomic approach to identify nucleolar interaction partners for a mammalian protein phosphatase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROTEOMICSSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207