MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096623561 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683271

Multi-Layer/Multi-Region Path Computation with Adaptation Capability Constraints

2010· article· en· W2096623561 on OpenAlexaff
Meral Shirazipour, Samuel Pierre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiprotocol Label SwitchingComputer scienceAdaptation (eye)Node (physics)Path (computing)ComputationLabel switchingContext (archaeology)Distributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Set (abstract data type)Computer networkLayer (electronics)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmQuality of serviceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the Multi-Layer (ML)/Multi-Region (MR) optimal path computation problem in Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks. Within the context of traffic engineering, path computation consists of routing Label Switched Paths (LSPs) under a multitude of constraints while optimizing resource utilization. One such problem consists of finding a shortest path in a heterogeneous GMPLS network where the different link switching types and node switching adaptation capabilities present their own set of constraints. We argue that most work have overlooked these constraints perhaps due to an ambiguous interpretation of the switching adaptation functions defined by GMPLS. To this end, we propose a novel GMPLS path computation algorithm including a binary integer program (BIP) formulation which considers the complete set of ML/MR node adaptation constraints related to nesting, un-nesting and conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207