MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2096628166 · doi:10.1177/070674370605101108

One-Year Stability of Diagnosis in First-Episode Nonaffective Psychosis: Influence of Sex

2006· article· en· W2096628166 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ana Cristina Chaves, Jean Addington, Mary V. Seeman, Donald Addington

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryMoodPsychologySpectrum disorderClinical psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sex influences the frequency and direction of diagnostic change 1 year after a first episode of nonaffective psychosis. METHOD: The subjects (n = 228) were individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychoses according to DSM-IV criteria at baseline and at 1 year. RESULTS: When diagnostic shifts occurred, men mainly shifted toward schizophrenia (84.6%), which was associated with more severe symptoms. In contrast, 72% of women in whom a diagnostic shift occurred shifted away from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder toward mood disorder. A shift to mood disorder in women was associated with an early age of illness onset. CONCLUSIONS: At initial presentation, nonaffective first-episode psychosis studies may underestimate the number of men and overestimate the number of women who will eventually receive a schizophrenia diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→