Evidence for the Regulation of Glycosylation of Golden Hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) Oviductin During the Estrous Cycle1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oviduct contributes to the reproductive environment by secreting various factors, including a family of glycoproteins termed oviductins. Although many studies have demonstrated that ovarian hormones modulate oviductin gene expression in several mammalian species, there has been controversy surrounding the regulation of golden hamster oviductin. The current study was undertaken to investigate the transcriptional and translational modifications of hamster oviductin during the estrous cycle. First, we verified that hamster oviductin mRNA expression remains constant throughout the estrous cycle by semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We then developed a polyclonal antibody against recombinant hamster oviductin (rhaOvm). The anti-rhaOvm antibody was subsequently used in conjunction with quantitative immunocytochemistry to investigate the oviductin levels in the hamster oviduct during the estrous cycle. Quantification of immunolabeling revealed a high, consistent level of glycoprotein throughout the estrous cycle. Therefore, it appears that the production of oviductin is not regulated differentially during the estrous cycle. Size variations in hamster oviductin expression were also investigated by Western blot analysis. The oviduct contains several forms of oviductin at each stage of the estrous cycle, the native glycosylated form(s) of 160-350 kDa, and several precursor forms of 70-100 kDa. Although variations in the intensities of the polydispersed band were not evident during the estrous cycle, additional bands ranging from 90 to 100 kDa were detected in the estrus, metestrus, and diestrus 1 stages. The results from the present investigations suggest that whereas ovarian hormones do not appear to influence the hamster oviductin mRNA and protein expressions, glycosylation of hamster oviductin appears to be differentially regulated during the estrous cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".