Salty Salamander: Occurrence of a<i>Dicamptodon tenebrosus</i>in a Tidal Stream
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amphibians, due to their highly permeable skin and egg membranes, are generally considered osmotically challenged animals and, thus, highly sensitive to brackish and saline environments (Shoemaker and Nagy 1977; Duellman and Trueb 1994). Due to their intolerance of salt water, amphibians have long been mostly discounted from occurring in areas directly influenced by the ocean (Darwin 1872), and notes of salamanders in these habitats are rare (Neill 1958). On 14 May 2012, we observed a larval Dicamptodon tenebrosus (Coastal Giant Salamander) in the tidal area of Hunter Creek, Curry County, Oregon (UTM Zone 10, 382898.3E, 4693923.4N, WGS84), 177 m from the Pacific Ocean. The animal was active, appeared in good body condition, and had a snout-vent length of 5.5 cm and a total length of 9.7 cm (Fig 1A). We found the salamander in a shallow sand and rock pool on the edge of the stream (,30 cm deep), with a salinity of 1.0 ppt. Freshwater is generally ,0.5 ppt; brackish water is 0.5 to 20 ppt; sea-water typically averages 35 ppt (Boaden and Seed 1985). We measured salinities of up to 1.4 ppt in this area on other days, and these concentrations have been found to be detrimental to caudate amphibian embryonic and larval survival and development (Hopkins and others 2013a, 2013b, 2014). The water temperature at the time of our observation was 14.26C. This area of the stream is devoid of riparian and aquatic vegetation, except for some algae growing on the rocks, and is essentially on a sandy and rocky beach (Fig. 1B, 1C). Affected dramatically by the tides, the water level of this habitat changes by almost 1.0 m between high and low tides (Fig. 1B, 1C). A dead sea-star (Forcipulatida, Pisaster spp.) was located a few meters away from the salamander. This habitat is also affected by coastal storm events, which sometimes lead to sea-water washing through this area (Fig. 1D). As we only found 1 individual D. tenebrosus in the tidal area of this stream, it is possible that these storm events may prevent a larger population from inhabiting this habitat due to temporarily increased salinity beyond this species’ tolerance level, or simply because the lack of vegetation and cover in this habitat renders it unsuitable. It is also possible that this individual may have been washed downstream due to spring flooding, and may be sensitive to increased salinity levels, as was found for Ambystoma gracile (Northwestern Salamander) in British Columbia, where larvae were found dead or dying in a tidal area with presumably increased salinity (Carl 1949). The D. tenebrosus that we found in the tidal area did not, however, appear to be dead or dying, and may have been more salt-tolerant than the individuals observed by Carl (1949). Ferguson (1956) also found 1 larval D. tenebrosus approximately 20 m from the edge of the high tide area of a coastal stream in Lincoln County, Oregon, but salinity was not measured. To the best of our knowledge, salinity tolerance in D. tenebrosus has not yet been experimentally determined, and more work clearly needs to be done to determine tidal habitat utilization and salt tolerance in this species. Although reports of salamanders in tidal habitats in the Pacific Northwest are rare, Ferguson (1956) found Taricha granulosa (Roughskinned Newts) in the tidal area of a stream in southern Oregon, and we also found a large breeding group (over 60 individuals) of this species in the same tidal area as the Dicamptodon we observed (Hopkins and Hopkins, pers. obs.). Batrachoseps relictus (Relictual Slender Salamanders) were reported on a beach in California (Moss Landing, Monterey County) under driftwood near the tide line (Licht and others 1975; B Bury, pers. comm.), as was B. pacificus (Channel Islands Slender Salamander) in the Channel Islands (Hansen and others 2005). Batrachoseps relictus was experimentally determined to be physiologically adapted to the increased salinity in this habitat (Licht and others 1975). GENERAL NOTES
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".