MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Type Traits on Functional Herd Life of Quebec Holsteins Assessed by Survival Analysis

2003· article· en· W2096698443 on OpenAlexaffabout
M.P. del Schneider, João Dürr, R.I. Cue, H.G. Monardes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerdAnimal scienceBiologyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Survival analysis was used to study the effects of composite and descriptive linear type traits on functional herd life of Quebec Holsteins. Functional herd life was defined as the length of life from first calving to death, culling, or censoring, and was adjusted for 305-d milk production. The dataset contained information from 331,105 cows from Quebec province calving for the first time between 1981 and 1995; 58% of the records had type information. Weibull models were fitted to analyze the data. The hazard function was described as the product of a baseline hazard function and the time-independent effects of age at first calving and type, and the time-dependent effects of year of calving, stage of lactation x lactation number, annual change in herd size, 305-d milk production, and herd-year (random). Analyses were done one at a time for each type trait. The strongest relationships between survival and composite type traits were found for final score, mammary system, and feet and legs. Among the linear type traits, the highest impact on functional herd life was found for traits related to the udder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207