MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096731051 · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2008.07.001

Impact of cytogenetic and genomic aberrations of the kallikrein locus in ovarian cancer

2008· article· en· W2096731051 on OpenAlexafffund
Jane Bayani, Miltiadis Paliouras, Chris Planque, Shannon J.C. Shan, Cassandra Graham, Jeremy A. Squire, Eleftherios P. Diamandis

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Oncology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationOntario Institute for Cancer Research
KeywordsBiologyOvarian cancerLocus (genetics)GeneComparative genomic hybridizationKallikreinCopy-number variationCancer researchGene dosageChromosomal translocationGene duplicationGeneticsCancerGene expressionGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tissue kallikrein (KLK) genes are a new source for biomarkers in ovarian cancer. However, there has been no systematic analysis of copy number and structural rearrangements related to their protein expression. Chromosomal rearrangements and copy number changes of the KLK region were studied by FISH with protein levels measured by ELISA. Ovarian cancer and cell lines revealed the KLK region was subject to copy number imbalances or involved in unbalanced translocations and were associated with increased protein expression of KLKs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. In this initial study, we introduce the potential for long-range chromosomal effects and copy number as a mechanism for the previously reported aberrant expression of many KLK genes in ovarian cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular OncologySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207