MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096736283 · doi:10.21874/rsp.v63i1.88

Reflexões sobre a atuação da Advocacia-Geral da União em projetos de geração de energia hidrelétrica

2014· article· pt· W2096736283 on OpenAlexaff
Tania Patricia de Lara Vaz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista do Serviço Público · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente trabalho contém algumas reflexões sobre o papel da advocacia de Estado, na qual está inserida a Advocacia-Geral da União e seus membros de carreira, no desenvolvimento e na implementação de políticas públicas e projetos do governo federal brasileiro, especificamente sob o enfoque da gestão pública e dos movimentos de modernização do Estado e reformulação do modelo burocrático. Com foco na fase de modelagem do leilão para compra de energia elétrica proveniente da Usina Hidrelétrica de Jirau, licitada de acordo com o novo modelo do setor elétrico, examina-se a atuação do órgão de consultoria e assessoramento jurídico do Ministério de Minas e Energia e o papel que desempenha.Palavras-chaves: disfunções burocráticas, Advocacia-Geral da União, setor elétrico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista do Serviço PúblicoSame topicEducation and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207