MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096740421 · doi:10.1109/bsc.2008.4563201

Optimal linear-time algorithm for uplink scheduling of packets with hard deadlines in WiMAX

2008· article· en· W2096740421 on OpenAlex
Arezou Mohammadi, Selim G. Akl, Firouz Behnamfar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWiMAXTelecommunications linkComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Network packetWirelessMathematical optimizationDistributed computingComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on a recent application of real-time scheduling in wireless communications industry; i.e., uplink scheduling for WiMAX systems. We address the problem of maximizing the number of packets to be sent in uplink such that the expectations from the system are guaranteed. In this work, we present, for the first time, a formal model for the general problem. Then, we use the properties of the application and derive an algorithm which has two highly favorable features: it finds the optimal solution in linear time. Finally, we present a method to fine-tune our general model in order to make sure that the model represents the actual system. This approach guarantees that the optimal algorithm for the model is indeed the optimal scheduler for the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207