MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096741982 · doi:10.1109/iccv.1990.139628

Analysis of facial images using physical and anatomical models

2002· article· en· W2096741982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionFace (sociological concept)Facial musclesSet (abstract data type)Computer graphicsGraphicsFacial expressionComputer graphics (images)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach is presented to the analysis of dynamic facial images. The approach exploits a realistic model of the human face. The face model, which may be simulated and rendered at interactive rates on a graphics workstation, incorporates a physically-based approximation to facial tissue and a set of anatomically-motivated facial muscle actuators. The authors consider the estimation of dynamic facial muscle contractions from video sequences of expressive human faces. They develop an estimation technique that uses deformable contour models to track the nonrigid motions of facial features in images. The technique computes robust muscle actuator controls, enabling the face model to resynthesize transient expressions accurately.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207