MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096764499 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1990.116548

Personal communication services-the new POTS

2002· article· en· W2096764499 on OpenAlexaff
J. Regnier, W.H. Cameron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)TelecommunicationsTelecommunications serviceService delivery frameworkService data pointComputer networkComputer scienceService providerIntelligent NetworkDigital subscriber lineService designPort (circuit theory)EngineeringBusinessMobile telephony

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Personal communication service (PCS) is a concept of telephone network services and operation which, in its full implementation, dissociates the service offered to the subscriber from the physical location of the service and access technology over which the service is delivered, and divests responsibility for service configuration and location from the telecommunications company to the subscriber. In PCS, the subscriber service consists of a personal subscriber number with, optionally, a personal service profile for advanced calling features such as call waiting, call forwarding, and calling number delivery. Service delivery is a software operation which consists of associating the subscriber service to a particular port in the network. Service configuration and location are controlled by the subscriber. PCS is presented, its technical requirements are discussed, and its implications for revenue generation and operation modernization are outlined.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.017
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Agent-Based Network ManagementFrench-language works237,207