MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2096772244

Moving our children to health. Active play every day.

2004· article· en· W2096772244 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maureen F Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsCollege of Family Physicians of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightPhysical activityPromotion (chess)MedicineChildhood obesityHealth promotionObesityAffect (linguistics)Family medicinePediatricsGerontologyPsychologyPublic healthNursingPhysical therapy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W would have thought that toddlers and preschoolers would be the focus of a physical activity campaign? Children are natural movers and never seem to sit still. Do they really need our help to be active? The answer is yes. Unfortunately, more children are obese then ever before, and we need to pay attention to even very young children’s physical activity levels. Results of a study in Scotland showed that children aged 3 to 5 were getting only one third the recommended amount of physical activity each day.1 In the 15 years ending in 1996, the prevalence of overweight children in Canada increased from 15% to 20% while the prevalence of childhood obesity more than doubled.2 Adolescents are presenting with type 2 diabetes, once thought to affect only adults.3 Physical inactivity, television watching, and video game playing are risk factors for obesity in Canadian children.4 Primary care physicians, given their central role in health promotion, can increase patients’ awareness of the benefits of physical activity and help them become more active. Physicians see most preschool children for yearly checkups. Parents and guardians of preschool children need to understand the importance of children making healthy, active choices very young. The College of Family Physicians of Canada collaborated with the Canadian Paediatric Society to produce a poster (included in the polybag with this issue) specifically designed for family physicians’ and pediatricians’ waiting rooms. The poster encourages parents and guardians to ask doctors how they can promote physical activity to their preschool children. Place this poster prominently in your office and ask parents what their children are doing at play time. Encourage parents to invite their children to move throughout the house with them instead of leaving the little ones in one room, such as the family room with the television on. Parents can play follow-the-leader and hide-and-seek with their children indoors or outdoors. Dancing to music is a great activity for parents and children. Remind parents that even very young children notice when their parents are physically active. Active parent role models can make physical activity appealing to small children. We do not need to design toddler exercise training programs to fight childhood obesity. We need only help children be the naturally active little people they were meant to be.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3180.145

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→