Molecular and Cellular Physiology of Apolipoprotein A-I Lipidation by the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter A1 (ABCA1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamics of ABCA1-mediated apoA-I lipidation were investigated in intact human fibroblasts induced with 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol and 9-cis-retinoic acid (stimulated cells). Specific binding parameters of (125)I-apoA-I to ABCA1 at 37 degrees C were determined: K(d) = 0.65 microg/ml, B(max) = 0.10 ng/microg cell protein. Lipid-free apoA-I inhibited the binding of (125)I-apoA-I to ABCA1 more efficiently than pre-beta(1)-LpA-I, reconstituted HDL particles r(LpA-I), or HDL(3) (IC(50) = 0.35 +/- 1.14, apoA-I; 1.69 +/- 1.07, pre-beta(1)-LpA-I; 17.91 +/- 1.39, r(LpA-I); and 48.15 +/- 1.72 microg/ml, HDL(3)). Treatment of intact cells with either phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C or sphingomyelinase affected neither (125)I-apoA-I binding nor (125)I-apoA-I/ABCA1 cross-linking. We next investigated the dynamics of apoA-I lipidation by monitoring the kinetic of apoA-I dissociation from ABCA1. The dissociation of (125)I-apoA-I from normal cells at 37 degrees C was rapid (t((1/2)) = 1.4 +/- 0.66 h; n = 3) but almost completely inhibited at either 15 or 4 degrees C. A time course analysis of apoA-I-containing particles released during the dissociation period showed nascent apoA-I-phospholipid complexes that exhibited alpha-electrophoretic mobility with a particle size ranging from 9 to 20 nm (designated alpha-LpA-I-like particles), whereas lipid-free apoA-I incubated with ABCA1 mutant (Q597R) cells was unable to form such particles. These results demonstrate that: 1) the physical interaction of apoA-I with ABCA1 does not depend on membrane phosphatidylcholine or sphingomyelin; 2) the association of apoA-I with lipids reduces its ability to interact with ABCA1; and 3) the lipid translocase activity of ABCA1 generates alpha-LpA-I-like particles. This process plays in vivo a key role in HDL biogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".