MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096778498 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277461

Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filters: Examples of Applications

2006· article· en· W2096778498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)GaussianAlgorithmState spaceFilter (signal processing)VocabularyExtension (predicate logic)State (computer science)Theoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceKalman filterMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we present some examples of applications of the so-called Rao-Blackwellised particle filter (RBPF). RBPFs are an extension to particle filters (PFs) which are applicable to conditionally linear-Gaussian state-space models. Although RBPF introductions and reviews may be found in many existing sources, going through the specific vocabulary and concepts of particle filtering can sometimes prove to be time-consuming for the non-initiated reader willing to experiment with alternative algorithms. The goal of the paper is to introduce RBPF-based methods in an accessible manner via a main algorithm, which is detailed enough to be readily applied to a wide range of problems. To illustrate the practicality and the convenience of the approach, the algorithm is then tailored to two examples from different fields. The first example is related to system identification, and the second is an application of speech enhancement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it