Type-2 Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Fuzzy Logic Modeling using Subtractive Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a subtractive clustering identification algorithm is introduced to model type-2 Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy logic systems (FLS). The type-2 TSK FLS identification algorithm is an extension of the type-1 TSK FLS modeling algorithm proposed in (S. L. Chiu, 1994), (S. L. Chiu, 1997). In the type-2 algorithm, subtractive clustering method is combined with least squares estimation algorithms to pre-identify a type-1 FLS form input/output data. Then using type-2 TSK FLS theory (J. M. Mendel, 2001), expand the type-1 FLS to a type-2 TSK FLS. Minimum error models are obtained through enumerative search of optimum values for spreading percentage of cluster centers and consequence parameters. By doing so, fuzzy modeling of type-2 TSK FLS is found to be more effective than that of type-1 TSK FLS. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of this method. A comparison of the Type-1 and -2 TSK FLSs is presented and the limitations of this method are discussed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".